Skip to main content

Modern Education and Work Issues


Have got an interesting read this morning - America's young workers: Destined for failure?

In regards to the education and "The obvious solution is for university, community college, and industry leaders to get together and design the coursework and the on-the-job experiences young workers need to be productive, learn, grow, and gain access to better and higher paying jobs.", I see a couple of issues here:

1. Current education system is still mentally a centuries old master-apprentice type of concept. At the times when it was relevant and apprenticeship may take years to spend on learning the certain trade the trade wouldn't change much and after somebody finishes the studies the trade would still be the same for the lifetime of the person or even several generations.
This system just simply doesn't cope effectively with our modern challenges of industries appearing and disappearing and older traditional occupations paying less and less to their practitioners. People who used to work with certain product (say in IT) today have to learn much more than just one product or a set of tools or areas of study. Therefore existing education methods, techniques and syllabus structures should be revised.

2. Not only education providers should bother, but also the prospective workforce or students should start learning different aspects of the world around them and do not expect a university to fix it for them. For example, there is heaps of opportunities now to learn extra subjects for free at the convenience of any place in the world where you live. This would add a good deal of potential for your future prospects. Indeed not all employers may accept this fact as a replacement for the proper certificate, however I believe it will change very soon.

3. Education system doesn't guarantee a good paying job placement anymore - regardless of the study area or industry. That's not only because of the education itself, but because of the whole economy system does work differently to what education system can offer.

4. Employers have got a high-level outdated expectations on candidates who live and would like to live better today. This again is not only a problem of just certain employer - the problem is in the fact that what people want today: from economy, from the business (as a driving force of all improvements) and from themselves doesn't match with the reality. The employer expects a huge list of skills, experiences and certifications for a job that a) is underpaid; b) doesn't really require that much. Here's an example: The recovery puzzle: Matching jobs to job-seekers. I don't think this is only relevant to USA - it's the common issue in many countries.

Those are main factors, in my opinion.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wine - 2011 Brown Brothers Crouchen Riesling

Very nice wine with fruity taste - peach and pear: Consumed with Hungarian salami. Tasting notes .
Post a Comment
Read more

Scrum - Team Culture and Wall Manifesto

In the Scrum framework one of the key components is the wall and daily stand-up. In some organisations I worked with the whole concept of the wall is not accepted by many developers, because of the stand-up necessity and "time waste". Very often all that methodology is used for the sake of methodology and not to achieve what we actually do - adding or creating value to our customer (usually called "The Business"). I can understand frustration that is caused by the wall and stand-up process. From the software developer perspective it is really a waste of time for the following reasons: 1. In 95% of cases developers are head down working like hell delivering valuable outcomes that they are accountable for. Extra effort to go to the wall, staying there for 15-30 minutes and listening or not listening to what others were doing yesterday and will be doing tomorrow is annoying for them; 2. The mere fact of having to do something mandatory to do that looks like...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mastering The Multitasking

There is usually two distinct perspectives on multi-tasking: 1. Multitasking is counterproductive. We get distracted by multiple tasks that all get our way and fight for our scarce attention, time and resources. This leads to a common fallacy that if you do multiple activities “at a time” you are not doing good work in any of those. 2. Multitasking is a way of getting many things done in a short period of time or in a long run. Indeed it can be either a disaster or a great helper depending on how it is used and practiced. Most recent research shows that we don’t do multiple tasks purely in parallel or simultaneously. That means we don’t purely multi-task, but switch between tasks and execute them one at a time, but by spending very small timeframes on each task. A good example from the history is a story about Julius Caesar capabilities in that area. Plutarch writes, “Caesar disciplined himself so far as to be able to dictate letters from on horseback, and to give directi...
1 comment
Read more