Skip to main content

Rule of Law and Tribunal in Sydney


On the 24th February 2015 (six months ago) the Owners Corporation of an apartment block lodged an application to NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) seeking orders to appoint compulsory manager of a strata scheme and to refund the fees paid to the former strata manager.

The application caused by negligent and inacceptable behaviour by strata manager and included the following concerns:

-       No proper service for two years

-       Breaching of the rules and not following the orders of Owners Corporation

-       Spending money on items that were not agreed or ordered by Owners Corporation

-       Not servicing fire safety inspections and insurance for the building appropriately

-       Other issues  

All the documentation related to the above-mentioned problems has been submitted to the Tribunal.
Finally the Owners Corporation has received the Tribunal decision (4th August 2015). The adjudicator on the matter decided to dismiss the application.

The first reason for dismissal is:

“The applicant has not provided a cogent set of submissions in this matter. Rather a bundle of documents has been provided without adequate explanation of their significance. It is therefore difficult to make out the nature of this claim”.

Very interesting. The nature of the claim is described in the application form. The “bundle of documents” was provided as evidence to the claim being reasonable and serious.

Further:

“If the Owners Corporation seeks to change the strata manager it can take steps to do this in the normal manner pursuant to its contractual rights and obligations”

Well, that’s why the Owners Corporation reached out to the Tribunal! Because the strata manager didn’t make it to resolve the case in “normal manner” and breached the “rights and obligations”. All that was in the application to the Tribunal.

And finally:

“This entire application appears to be misconceived. It may be appropriate for the applicant to obtain legal advice regarding the issues which are raised in the context of this application.”

I think this is awesome response. The adjudicator is saying “your matter is too difficult – I dismiss it”. Well it was clear to the applicants that the matter is not easy! They required a decision on the matter, not an advice to seek legal help.

In addition to this “decision” it took about two years for Owners Corporation to realise that strata manager is doing wrong actions and is useless, plus about half a year to confirm that the application to Tribunal is required, plus three(!) weeks to sign the paperwork before it was finally lodged with the Tribunal. 

Altogether makes almost 3 years.


Nice work!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Energy Business Case - Coal Mine in West Virginia

Situation Coal in Africa: An opportunity is available to invest in a coal mine in West Virginia. The mine’s value is less than in past years because of actual and anticipated restrictions on coal-fired power generation in the United States. However, the mine has a chance to sell its coal on contract to a public utility in West Africa. The utility is working through the World Bank for financing to build a number of coal-fired power plants. If they obtain World Bank financing, then a customer for the coal mine is assured, at least for the duration of the contracts. The power plants will employ the best current technology for burning coal, which exceeds all current air quality standards for the region. However, the power plants will not be designed to attempt carbon capture. The area of Africa the plants will serve suffers from extreme energy poverty, with some of the lowest per capita energy consumption in the world.

Overview of the Region West Africa is the westernmost region …

Energy Market Analysis - Coal Reserves for Decade Ending 2012 and Price Forecast

According to the British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy, 2013, global coal reserves declined in the decade ending 2012:

Figure 1. Proved coal reserves.

Proved reserves of coal are generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainly can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions.

If we look at supply and demand factors in the decline, we can see that:

a) Coal price has grown significantly in the decade ending 20121:


  Figure 2. Prices in US Dollars per tonne.

b) Coal consumption has also grown significantly worldwide2:


Figure 3. Coal consumption by region.

c) The price of substitutes (i.e. Natural Gas) has also grown. Not so in North America though, but if we look at the world trend it is growing3:


Figure 4. Natural gas prices.

Therefore if the rule of supply and demand worked we would see increase in proved reserves for coal, because increase in dem…

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - part 17

It's been a while since the last post In January 2016 the owner lodged an application to NCAT against owners corporation to fix three major defects: - waterproofing of large windows in the living room and bedroom which led to windows full replacement - bathroom drain fix - planterbox fix The owners corporation didn't come to mediation and tribunal ordered to fix all defects within 2 months (the deadline was 8th July 2016). The owners corporation as usual didn't rush to comply with the order regarding two items: bathroom and planterbox. The windows works started end of April 2016. At the same time owners corporation decided to check whether it's a warranty and original builder should fix the issues. That was also related to the fact that the variation was submitted by the current contractor who started fixing the defect. So the owners corporation stopped all works in the middle and went off for a month to "make decision". The decision was made at the end of J…