Skip to main content

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - part 17

It's been a while since the last post
In January 2016 the owner lodged an application to NCAT against owners corporation to fix three major defects:
- waterproofing of large windows in the living room and bedroom which led to windows full replacement
- bathroom drain fix
- planterbox fix
The owners corporation didn't come to mediation and tribunal ordered to fix all defects within 2 months (the deadline was 8th July 2016).
The owners corporation as usual didn't rush to comply with the order regarding two items: bathroom and planterbox. The windows works started end of April 2016.
At the same time owners corporation decided to check whether it's a warranty and original builder should fix the issues. That was also related to the fact that the variation was submitted by the current contractor who started fixing the defect.
So the owners corporation stopped all works in the middle and went off for a month to "make decision". The decision was made at the end of July. All that time instead of windows there was plywood (image)
In the middle of June the owners corporation requested extension for two months from the tribunal and tribunal granted extension.
Two other problems were still not addressed and the owners corporation didn't even want to fix those.
The strata manager didn't provide any information to the owner during that period and only final decisions, taking the side of majority of executive committee and not the right side.
Long story short an extension came to an end 8th September and the owners corporation had to address the two remaining issues with only one quote from some contractor. This is against the rules, because at least three quotes have to be obtained.
The works were finished 1st October 2016 which is 5 months since it started.
5 months to actually fix the defects in one apartment!
All that time it's been an ongoing building site.
Now the owners corporation are agitated about the total costs involved to fix the defects that were original builder's responsibility.
But finally the defects were fixed - 5 years later! 😃
It would have been much easier if owners, executive committee members and strata managers were educated enough and resolve the issue sooner than later.
There are aids to improve this.
Also every strata unit owner should know what is their responsibility and what is entire owners corporation's. That knowledge helps to save enormous amounts of time and money in many cases.
In the case I described in a set of posts, some executive committee members and unconscious strata managers tried to make the owner responsible for the defects that are indeed common property to maintain. They didn't succeed in that though. :)
Great example of very useful tool to help identify the responsibility for the defects is StrataBoss app


Popular posts from this blog

Energy Business Case - Coal Mine in West Virginia

Situation Coal in Africa: An opportunity is available to invest in a coal mine in West Virginia. The mine’s value is less than in past years because of actual and anticipated restrictions on coal-fired power generation in the United States. However, the mine has a chance to sell its coal on contract to a public utility in West Africa. The utility is working through the World Bank for financing to build a number of coal-fired power plants. If they obtain World Bank financing, then a customer for the coal mine is assured, at least for the duration of the contracts. The power plants will employ the best current technology for burning coal, which exceeds all current air quality standards for the region. However, the power plants will not be designed to attempt carbon capture. The area of Africa the plants will serve suffers from extreme energy poverty, with some of the lowest per capita energy consumption in the world.

Overview of the Region West Africa is the westernmost region …

Wine - Castello del Poggio Moscato Provincia di Pavia

Awesome wine. Sweet with notes of pear, caramel, apricot.

Some details

Mastering The Multitasking

There is usually two distinct perspectives on multi-tasking:

1. Multitasking is counterproductive. We get distracted by multiple tasks that all get our way and fight for our scarce attention, time and resources. This leads to a common fallacy that if you do multiple activities “at a time” you are not doing good work in any of those.

2. Multitasking is a way of getting many things done in a short period of time or in a long run.

Indeed it can be either a disaster or a great helper depending on how it is used and practiced.

Most recent research shows that we don’t do multiple tasks purely in parallel or simultaneously. That means we don’t purely multi-task, but switch between tasks and execute them one at a time, but by spending very small timeframes on each task.

A good example from the history is a story about Julius Caesar capabilities in that area. Plutarch writes, “Caesar disciplined himself so far as to be able to dictate letters from on horseback, and to give directions to two w…