Skip to main content

Local Council Issues - NSW

Buying and managing a strata unit is a challenge sometimes, but the things can be worse if the property is located near an unscrupulous commercial tenants/proprietors. In some cases this is aggravated by local council.

Here's an example of an issue that came up second time in two and half years.

The council approves commercial operation (cafe) in a place that was not designed for this purpose. It is a mixed development that consists of a commercial shops and a residential strata:


The building doesn't suit for a loud business, food serving business, bar or liquor serving business for a number of reasons:

1. Close proximity of the residential units
2. The design of the building that doesn't allow commercial food preparation and serving of patrons in the courtyards or when the shop doors are opened, because all odours and noise go inside the building and echo into all the units facing those commercial shops.
3. There is no waste management facility for commercial shops. This a lack of design, but nevertheless this issue was known before approval.

This approval causes dispute between many people (more than 30). Some of those people conduct illegal activity as a result of this awkward situation.

People address it with the council - after a month of waiting there is a response: it's a matter between those parties, council is not related. Well, obviously there is a problem here - if council doesn't want to be involved in dispute that arise from their not very correct decision - why they make this approval first and/or why they are not helping to resolve the issue?

In addition to that, if there is an application to the council they organise an independent assessment panel (MIAP). Even if the MIAP decision is to refuse the application, the council still approves!
What's the point of:
a) approving the applications that are controversial and adverse to local residents,
b) involving parties the decision of which you ignore,
c) wasting other peoples time and money?

Too many questions with no reasonable answer.

Here's some other posts related to strata property issues:
Construction issues resolution in Sydney
Real Estate & Strata Living

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scrum - Team Culture and Wall Manifesto

In the Scrum framework one of the key components is the wall and daily stand-up. In some organisations I worked with the whole concept of the wall is not accepted by many developers, because of the stand-up necessity and "time waste". Very often all that methodology is used for the sake of methodology and not to achieve what we actually do - adding or creating value to our customer (usually called "The Business"). I can understand frustration that is caused by the wall and stand-up process. From the software developer perspective it is really a waste of time for the following reasons: 1. In 95% of cases developers are head down working like hell delivering valuable outcomes that they are accountable for. Extra effort to go to the wall, staying there for 15-30 minutes and listening or not listening to what others were doing yesterday and will be doing tomorrow is annoying for them; 2. The mere fact of having to do something mandatory to do that looks like

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - part 17

It's been a while since  the last post In January 2016 the owner lodged an application to NCAT against owners corporation to fix three major defects: - waterproofing of large windows in the living room and bedroom which led to windows full replacement - bathroom drain fix - planterbox fix The owners corporation didn't come to mediation and tribunal ordered to fix all defects within 2 months (the deadline was 8th July 2016). The owners corporation as usual didn't rush to comply with the order regarding two items: bathroom and planterbox. The windows works started end of April 2016. At the same time owners corporation decided to check whether it's a warranty and original builder should fix the issues. That was also related to the fact that the variation was submitted by the current contractor who started fixing the defect. So the owners corporation stopped all works in the middle and went off for a month to "make decision". The decision was mad

Wine - 2011 Brown Brothers Crouchen Riesling

Very nice wine with fruity taste - peach and pear: Consumed with Hungarian salami. Tasting notes .