Skip to main content

Development Application for Strata Common Wall Increase

There is a building that is constituted by Residential strata (28 units) and Commercial strata (2 offices and 2 retail shops).
Residential block and Commercial block face each other and have got shared walls between courtyards as per following figure:


Commercial Strata decided to enclose their courtyards (Courtyard 1 & 2 on the figure above). Enclosure would increase existing shared walls by 60 cm. Their floor level is lower therefore from their side it is about 25% increase, but from the Residential side it is about 40% increase:


Commercial strata owner sent a proposal for wall increase to Residential strata. Residential strata had a meeting and didn't consent to the proposed enclosures. A letter from Residential was sent to Commercial with "No" for proposed enclosures outlining the reasons.
Part of the proposed structure will encroach to private property - residential owners' courtyards.
Therefore written consent from the owners of either common wall or individual owners was not provided.

Commercial strata didn't respond anything, but lodged a Development Application (DA) to local council.
They commissioned some company to produce a Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE). That SEE was all in favour of Commercial strata and stated that there is no impact on adjoining properties.
That SEE was attached to DA.

Residential strata owners corporation and individual residential owners made several submissions against the DA.
The Council originally decided to approve the DA, but then organised an independent assessment panel. Some owners went to publicly address that panel against the DA. However the panel approved the DA.

According to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) a DA needs to be either made by the owner of the land affected by the DA or any other person so long as the owner has provided consent in writing.
In the case above not only owners didn't provide consent, but explicitly provided no consent.

Following items come up in order to understand the problem:
  • The owners of the property must lodge the application. In this instances both strata's own the common wall so both owners consents have not been given.

  • The proposed development uses common property and also private property.

  • Failure to provide the proper owners' consent may have declared the development application invalid and void from the beginning. However Council still approved the DA.  
Now the questions:
  1. What could be the best way to stop the construction work to start? It looks like Commercial strata only respects the Council's decision and ignore's Residential owners.

  2. How to prevent these activities from Commercial strata in the future?

  3. How to make Council reject the DA as it seems invalid and to take responsibility? So it is easier for others who will be dealing with DAs in the future. 
Would be great to get some ideas.

UPDATE:
Residential strata owners found that the wall belongs entirely to them. The letter has been sent to Council with the findings. Read the follow up: http://traveloga.blogspot.com/2014/08/development-application-approval.html

Also have a look at my post regarding strata living and what to look at before and when you buy a strata unit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scrum - Team Culture and Wall Manifesto

In the Scrum framework one of the key components is the wall and daily stand-up. In some organisations I worked with the whole concept of the wall is not accepted by many developers, because of the stand-up necessity and "time waste". Very often all that methodology is used for the sake of methodology and not to achieve what we actually do - adding or creating value to our customer (usually called "The Business"). I can understand frustration that is caused by the wall and stand-up process. From the software developer perspective it is really a waste of time for the following reasons: 1. In 95% of cases developers are head down working like hell delivering valuable outcomes that they are accountable for. Extra effort to go to the wall, staying there for 15-30 minutes and listening or not listening to what others were doing yesterday and will be doing tomorrow is annoying for them; 2. The mere fact of having to do something mandatory to do that looks like

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - part 17

It's been a while since  the last post In January 2016 the owner lodged an application to NCAT against owners corporation to fix three major defects: - waterproofing of large windows in the living room and bedroom which led to windows full replacement - bathroom drain fix - planterbox fix The owners corporation didn't come to mediation and tribunal ordered to fix all defects within 2 months (the deadline was 8th July 2016). The owners corporation as usual didn't rush to comply with the order regarding two items: bathroom and planterbox. The windows works started end of April 2016. At the same time owners corporation decided to check whether it's a warranty and original builder should fix the issues. That was also related to the fact that the variation was submitted by the current contractor who started fixing the defect. So the owners corporation stopped all works in the middle and went off for a month to "make decision". The decision was mad

How strata owners corporation "solves" problems or Construction issues resolution in Sydney - Part 16

Almost 8 months passed from the time of previous post and here's how the owners corporations activities looked like to "resolve" the defects/problems: 1. Independent inspection report was ordered and completed 1st June 2015. The report confirmed the defects that were known to owners corporation already. It should be noted that in the period between December 2014 and June 2015 the only attempts by owners corporation to resolve the issues were to convince the lot owner that it's the owner's personal responsibility. Therefore half a year gone with a couple of meetings only, because people were "on holidays", "busy" etc. 2. Between 3rd July 2015 and end of July 2015 the strata manager spent "contacting the builders for quotes". Until owner called the strata manager nothing have happend. 3. By the end of August 2015 all quotes were in place. The meeting of all owners was set up for the 7th October! Because as usual "holid