Skip to main content

Development Application for Strata Common Wall Increase

There is a building that is constituted by Residential strata (28 units) and Commercial strata (2 offices and 2 retail shops).
Residential block and Commercial block face each other and have got shared walls between courtyards as per following figure:

Commercial Strata decided to enclose their courtyards (Courtyard 1 & 2 on the figure above). Enclosure would increase existing shared walls by 60 cm. Their floor level is lower therefore from their side it is about 25% increase, but from the Residential side it is about 40% increase:

Commercial strata owner sent a proposal for wall increase to Residential strata. Residential strata had a meeting and didn't consent to the proposed enclosures. A letter from Residential was sent to Commercial with "No" for proposed enclosures outlining the reasons.
Part of the proposed structure will encroach to private property - residential owners' courtyards.
Therefore written consent from the owners of either common wall or individual owners was not provided.

Commercial strata didn't respond anything, but lodged a Development Application (DA) to local council.
They commissioned some company to produce a Statement of Environmental Effects (SEE). That SEE was all in favour of Commercial strata and stated that there is no impact on adjoining properties.
That SEE was attached to DA.

Residential strata owners corporation and individual residential owners made several submissions against the DA.
The Council originally decided to approve the DA, but then organised an independent assessment panel. Some owners went to publicly address that panel against the DA. However the panel approved the DA.

According to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) a DA needs to be either made by the owner of the land affected by the DA or any other person so long as the owner has provided consent in writing.
In the case above not only owners didn't provide consent, but explicitly provided no consent.

Following items come up in order to understand the problem:
  • The owners of the property must lodge the application. In this instances both strata's own the common wall so both owners consents have not been given.

  • The proposed development uses common property and also private property.

  • Failure to provide the proper owners' consent may have declared the development application invalid and void from the beginning. However Council still approved the DA.  
Now the questions:
  1. What could be the best way to stop the construction work to start? It looks like Commercial strata only respects the Council's decision and ignore's Residential owners.

  2. How to prevent these activities from Commercial strata in the future?

  3. How to make Council reject the DA as it seems invalid and to take responsibility? So it is easier for others who will be dealing with DAs in the future. 
Would be great to get some ideas.

Residential strata owners found that the wall belongs entirely to them. The letter has been sent to Council with the findings. Read the follow up:

Also have a look at my post regarding strata living and what to look at before and when you buy a strata unit.


Popular posts from this blog

Energy Business Case - Coal Mine in West Virginia

Situation Coal in Africa: An opportunity is available to invest in a coal mine in West Virginia. The mine’s value is less than in past years because of actual and anticipated restrictions on coal-fired power generation in the United States. However, the mine has a chance to sell its coal on contract to a public utility in West Africa. The utility is working through the World Bank for financing to build a number of coal-fired power plants. If they obtain World Bank financing, then a customer for the coal mine is assured, at least for the duration of the contracts. The power plants will employ the best current technology for burning coal, which exceeds all current air quality standards for the region. However, the power plants will not be designed to attempt carbon capture. The area of Africa the plants will serve suffers from extreme energy poverty, with some of the lowest per capita energy consumption in the world.

Overview of the Region West Africa is the westernmost region …

Energy Market Analysis - Coal Reserves for Decade Ending 2012 and Price Forecast

According to the British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy, 2013, global coal reserves declined in the decade ending 2012:

Figure 1. Proved coal reserves.

Proved reserves of coal are generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainly can be recovered in the future from known deposits under existing economic and operating conditions.

If we look at supply and demand factors in the decline, we can see that:

a) Coal price has grown significantly in the decade ending 20121:

  Figure 2. Prices in US Dollars per tonne.

b) Coal consumption has also grown significantly worldwide2:

Figure 3. Coal consumption by region.

c) The price of substitutes (i.e. Natural Gas) has also grown. Not so in North America though, but if we look at the world trend it is growing3:

Figure 4. Natural gas prices.

Therefore if the rule of supply and demand worked we would see increase in proved reserves for coal, because increase in dem…

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - part 17

It's been a while since the last post In January 2016 the owner lodged an application to NCAT against owners corporation to fix three major defects: - waterproofing of large windows in the living room and bedroom which led to windows full replacement - bathroom drain fix - planterbox fix The owners corporation didn't come to mediation and tribunal ordered to fix all defects within 2 months (the deadline was 8th July 2016). The owners corporation as usual didn't rush to comply with the order regarding two items: bathroom and planterbox. The windows works started end of April 2016. At the same time owners corporation decided to check whether it's a warranty and original builder should fix the issues. That was also related to the fact that the variation was submitted by the current contractor who started fixing the defect. So the owners corporation stopped all works in the middle and went off for a month to "make decision". The decision was made at the end of J…