Skip to main content

Construction issues resolution in Sydney - Part 4


On 09/02/2013 the builder came to inspect the exact same defects they have been aware of since September 2012.

During the inspection the builder verbally agreed to fix majority of those defects, rejected some of them as they believed those were maintenance problems and not the building problem and rejected their liability on some of the defects.
The owners corporation requested a report, which should include a list a of defects and exact dates when those defects would be rectified. The builder verbally agreed with that.

After 10 days - 19/02/2013 - the builder sent an email to the owners corporation and Fair Trading that included the unit numbers and the defects that will be fixed/not fixed.
Some defects were missing from the list and as usual there were no firm dates.

Owners Corporation have responded to that email (including Fair Trading) that the report is not complete.

After three days - 21/02/2013 - the builder sent an email providing the contact details of the person who was going to look after the defects rectification and forwarded a correspondence from that person that someone was possibly coming in the following week to fix some of the defects.
They also requested the evidence that some owners notified them about some of the defects! After four times they have been inspecting those!
No certain dates, no list of defects in the email.
As usual nobody appeared or contacted on the following week.

Owners corporation called Fair Trading on 01/03/2013 and the case has been submitted to the Fair Trading inspectors.

UPDATE:
19/03/2013 Fair Trading inspector called and schedule an on site inspection for 17/04/2013.

To be continued.

Other posts from this story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Energy Business Case - Coal Mine in West Virginia

Situation Coal in Africa: An opportunity is available to invest in a coal mine in West Virginia. The mine’s value is less than in past years because of actual and anticipated restrictions on coal-fired power generation in the United States. However, the mine has a chance to sell its coal on contract to a public utility in West Africa. The utility is working through the World Bank for financing to build a number of coal-fired power plants. If they obtain World Bank financing, then a customer for the coal mine is assured, at least for the duration of the contracts. The power plants will employ the best current technology for burning coal, which exceeds all current air quality standards for the region. However, the power plants will not be designed to attempt carbon capture. The area of Africa the plants will serve suffers from extreme energy poverty, with some of the lowest per capita energy consumption in the world.

Overview of the Region West Africa is the westernmost region …

Wine - Castello del Poggio Moscato Provincia di Pavia

Awesome wine. Sweet with notes of pear, caramel, apricot.


Some details

Mastering The Multitasking

There is usually two distinct perspectives on multi-tasking:

1. Multitasking is counterproductive. We get distracted by multiple tasks that all get our way and fight for our scarce attention, time and resources. This leads to a common fallacy that if you do multiple activities “at a time” you are not doing good work in any of those.

2. Multitasking is a way of getting many things done in a short period of time or in a long run.

Indeed it can be either a disaster or a great helper depending on how it is used and practiced.

Most recent research shows that we don’t do multiple tasks purely in parallel or simultaneously. That means we don’t purely multi-task, but switch between tasks and execute them one at a time, but by spending very small timeframes on each task.

A good example from the history is a story about Julius Caesar capabilities in that area. Plutarch writes, “Caesar disciplined himself so far as to be able to dictate letters from on horseback, and to give directions to two w…